Re-development in Peabody should always be connected to responsibility

25 Sep

By Bob Croce, EOP Publisher

It was a good meeting last night at the West Branch Library. A night during which residents were presented research by a consultant on how we can revitalize Peabody’s downtown, and then asked their opinions on what should go in currently developable properties.

But there was also a moment near the end the meeting that summed up a major challenge we face as we go through the process of not only revitalizing parts of our community, but also reinvigorating our economic engine.

When the presentation was over, and all of the brainstorming done, Community Development Office official Blair Haney made a comment that spoke to something that’s unseen by many, but gotten us into past messes when it comes to development. Essentially, what Mr. Haney told the audience was that — in order to move forward — we need the full cooperation of the Peabody City Council and the residents when it comes to granting developers special permits.

Giving him the benefit of the doubt, I don’t think Mr. Haney was talking about granting special permits to build everything and anything developers want. After all, haven’t we recently seen the ugly side of blind cooperation when it comes to many developers in Peabody?

But it should cause us to pause, think, and ensure that we don’t get fooled again. This is indeed a cautionary tale.

Wasn’t it unchallenged “cooperation” that got us that ugly condo complex on Walnut Street, and isn’t it unchallenged “cooperation” that is causing the residents of the Winona Street neighborhood near Route 1 major headaches? I could go on and on about developers maximizing profits by building cheap, ugly projects,  grossly violating the terms special permits, and not caring about residents’ property rights.

But let’s spare you of  those gory details, and say that I don’t think there are many residents who don’t agree that we need an economic rebirth in Peabody. After all, we have a lot to pay for these days, and bringing more responsible development to the city will help us pay for capital improvements. At the same time, it would stabilize the residential tax rate. More businesses mean a lot more commercial tax revenue, which in turn means that residents aren’t taxed to death. As a result, we’d find a sane way to pay for a much-need new middle school, and flood mitigation, and all of the other improvements necessary for our civic infrastructure.

Economic development would be a great thing for Peabody, but until we get smart about it and get the right kind of development, a request for our full cooperation with developers sends chills up the spines of residents, who have had their quality of life trampled on far too often.

As a city councilor, I would most-definitely be pro-business and pro-economic development. But the rights of residents still need to come first, and those developers with a track record of violating their special permits can’t be given more chances to mess this all up again. It can no longer be a case of everything goes in Peabody, not in our downtown, and not out on Route 1.

What we need is responsible and well-planned out community re-development, and for Peabody to partner only with reputable developers to get this all done. If it’s  not the right thing to do for a neighborhood, city councilors should never fear  saying “no.”

That’s what those residents who attended that excellent meeting last night want, and that’s what they and our city deserves.

3 Responses to “Re-development in Peabody should always be connected to responsibility”

  1. Anonymous October 1, 2013 at 9:28 am #

    OG wants to know…are we brushing the dust off this blog and getting back into the fray? where is the beef? what are the key local issues as we head to ‘election season’? what do any of the candidates stand for? where can I find their ‘position statements’ on anything?is political interest and involvement bogged down in the federal government shutdown and disgusted apathy these days? has this malaise now filtered down to the local level as well?

  2. racroce October 1, 2013 at 9:50 am #

    Hi OG,
    Welcome back to the fray. I apologize that I haven’t been able to really keep up with the blog lately. But campaigning has kept me preoccupied. When Nov. 5th comes and goes, look to the sky and you’ll probably see the “Bat Signal” once again. 🙂

    As for the election, it definitely has been quiet. This usually happens in a year when the mayor is unopposed. We also have the unusual circumstance of an unopposed school committee race. Then there’s the issue of “election fatigue.” We’ve had five elections already in less than a year!

    Stay tuned, though, I’m going to try and post as I can. Considering I’m a candidate, it’s tough, though, for me to post anything or to comment on other candidates right now. Call it “political courtesy.”

    But certainly, others are welcome to do so.

  3. Anonymous October 18, 2013 at 12:44 pm #

    Mr. Croce. I have missed your blog and hope you will get a chance to write more after the election. It was very informative always. Also I saw on your Facebook page how you want to keep your campaign positive but are you aware that your opponent is out there saying very negative things about you? He came to my door in Rolling Hills and told me he was more qualified then you and he was going to win so I am better off voting for him because you were not up to the job. Was really turned off by his arrogance and his horrible personality. Good luck. I hope you beat this guy by thousands of votes. he is acting like a jerk

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: